Check out @SolutionsIQ’s Tweet: https://twitter.com/SolutionsIQ/status/380369527068164096
Today’s favorite agile tweet
Check out @ProjectsAtWork’s Tweet: https://twitter.com/ProjectsAtWork/status/372025038955757569
Favorite Agile Tweet of the Day
Check out @mike_bowler’s Tweet: https://twitter.com/mike_bowler/status/371049721424388096
Backlog Grooming
How many types of Agile Retrospectives are there, anyway?
The other day I noticed that we were getting pretty stagnant with our sprint retrospectives. I have been asking these questions: “What went well? What went less well? What areas improved from last sprint? What areas need improvement?” Sometimes we get some good discussions going, but most of the time I have to prod my teammates for answers and feedback. This prompted me to go in search of something new and better.
|
Name
|
Summary
|
Use
|
Approx. Duration (mins)
|
|
Uses De Bono’s 6 Thinking Hats to investigate process improvement
|
General use, but also a good alternative to shuffling card type retrospectives
|
60
|
|
|
A retrospective in which teams rated their abilities in each of the categories, displayed the different ratings on a spider graph, and then discussed the result.
|
To talk about what abilities are important to an Agile team and how your team rates against them
|
60
|
|
|
Uses Appreciative Inquiry to identify what went so well. There is no blame or negativity, and builds on the Prime Directive, that everyone in the team did the best job they could possibly do.
|
To remind everyone what a good job their doing rather than focusing on negatives every time you run a retrospective.
|
60
|
|
|
Participants choose top 5 issues and bring them along for group to discuss and resolve
|
Expose the most pressing issues in an initially anonymous manner and determine the most effective actions to resolve them
|
45
|
|
|
A Retrospective Technique for short term actions from long term goals
|
Really good for forcing achievable actions from your retrospectives.
|
40
|
|
|
The facilitator captures team open-ended feedback using a wheel that encourages team members to assess an iteration or milestone using 5 categories. Allow some time following completing the “wheel” to discuss and agree on specific changes to implement
|
Obtain feedback on team process in order to learn what should be continued and what should be adjusted as the team moves forward. Is a fast way to conduct a “meta” process discussion.
|
10-25
|
|
|
The method ensures that each participant meets and interacts with every other participant.
|
When retrospective participants do not know each other well
|
Variable!
|
|
|
Use various tools such as a complexity radar to discover and find out how to deal with the complexity in your project
|
Many projects go awry due to excessive complexity; use this plan to evaluate whether your team is approaching things in the simplest way that can work; especially when the deadlines begin to loom.
|
40-60
|
|
|
A plan designed around the force field analysis technique
|
A retrospective for your whole company/department or to analyse a particular topic
|
60
|
|
|
Focused and time-constrained by using the Pomodoro technique
|
Useful for determining a single action to improve the work of a small team
|
25
|
|
|
A retrospective for retrospectives
|
To learn how to improve the effectiveness of your retrospectives
|
60+
|
|
|
Iteration retrospective
|
To get different perspectives on the same events
|
60
|
|
|
Simple sprint retrospective
|
Basic / everyday retrospective plan
|
90 – 120
|
|
|
Liked – Learned – Lacked – Longed For
|
Iteration and project retrospectives as well as for retrospection of training and conference events.
|
90 – 120
|
|
|
What anchors slow the team down, what wind propels it forward?
|
Good for the “gather data” and “generate insights” portions of a retrospective
|
90 – 120
|
|
|
Review, Plus-Delta, Vote, Actions, Owners
|
A weekly retrospective for your project
|
60
|
|
|
Use the answers as base to get all the good things and bad things that happened
|
A different way to “gather data” and to get all different opinions on a subject
|
60
|
|
|
An approach to scaling retrospectives by collecting outcomes across an Agile Release Train, Tribe or any multi team scenario.
|
Use for understanding challenges and opportunities across when scaling agile.
|
15-30
|
Recommended Agile Reading
From time to time, I will review and/or list books that I find helpful. I don’t have time to go into a full review while I’m on my lunch break, but right now I’m re-reading
The Agile Samurai: How Agile Masters Deliver Great Software (Pragmatic Programmers), by Jonathan Rasmusson. It’s a great back-to-basics book for those of us who have been doing the agile thing for a while. For those of us who are newer to the agile universe, it is a must have for your Agile Library. It also has some great tips and tricks for all role types. I highly recommend it. You can get the Kindle Edition for less than $20 on Amazon right now.
How to Give a GREAT Demo!
What to include in every demo deck
Project Goal
Customer Value
Sprint Goals
Project Status
Live Demo
What to Expect Next
Things you need to do as a teammate
BE THERE
Participate
Make sure the demo is recorded
Announce wins
Demo Prep
If we promise something in a previous demo, we need to deliver it in a subsequent demo. If we don’t, then we need to explain why.
Have fun with images!
User Stories: Make ‘em SMALLER, please!
User stories are the building blocks of whatever project we’re working on, are they not? They give structure. They give solidarity. They stand things up. Epics are the larger, overall stories that lay the foundation. When building something, it is prudent to have the larger stories on the bottom and the smaller stories on the top. I could get into the engineering aspects of building design, but I’m not smart enough to discuss such things. I’ll stick to what I know. Here’s what I’m getting at: make the user stories smaller than the epics. This seems like a no-brainer, but too-big user stories are way too common.
Welcome!
Hello and welcome to my first blog post on Scrum Bubbles! I know there are LOADS of scrum resources out there, so thanks for stopping by.
Let me start by telling you why I decided to join the hoards of scrum blogs. I love being a scrum master. Pure and simple. I love to keep teams moving forward and all the interaction that entails. I’m hoping that my love of people will bubble into my posts and help you see how to ALWAYS look at the human element in what we do as scrum masters.
What will I share, you ask? I’m going to share my ups and downs with you. I’ll share best practices (and not so best ones) and detail training I’m getting. I’ll look at trends in the community. I hope we can share laughter and thoughts. I hope to not only give you ideas but to encourage you to give your ideas as well. I want us to share in a common pool of knowledge and help one another. So… what do you say? Are you in?